Looking at the entry of Crack's Call, these limitations are arc of sight, straight line, 4d6. It carries on that such spells will have their own limitations outlined in their entry. 31 of the BRB tells us that some older books have spells with no category, and so provides the legitimation for the former assessment. It would be easy to class it as direct damage but again, 8 pages of FAQ plus whatever relevant sections in the BRB FAQ did not do that. Read in this light, they all make some sort of sense but nobody really knows, and not even the longest FAQ in the history of FAQ's has managed to illuminate these questions.Īs to Crack's Call, it, as all other Skaven spells, does not have a category. It would appear that each and every para regarding shooting / ranged attacks in the Skaven book was written with regard to BS-based weapons only. We meet the very same problem with a template and a roll-off when it comes to cannon and the Bell/Grey Seer. I doubt that I have ever seen such a mess of writing, hidden and explicit meanings and shoddy phrasing. The Skaven book is one huge problem, rules-wise.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |